|
|
|||||||
Employment Law E-BulletinOct 2007QUICK LINK The case of Holmes v Active Sensors Ltd confirms that, provided an employer follows the statutory procedure, it is not age discrimination to retire an employee at 65. The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Corus UK Ltd v Mainwaring is also pro-employer in that it sets some ground rules as to how far employers need to go when investigating employees whose sickness absence is in question. Obviously the big news this month is the change to holiday entitlements which we have covered in our main feature but the minimum wage has also been increased and the government recently announced a new timetable for the expected paternity leave rules. In terms of the national minimum wage, 1 October 2007 saw the rates increase as follows: * Workers aged 22 or more - £5.52 per hour You may recall that back in October last year we reported on the government’s plans to allow the father or partner of a mother who returns to work without using up her full maternity leave entitlement to take the remaining allowance as paternity leave up to a maximum of 26 weeks. This was due to be implemented in April 2009 but the government has now announced a delay to this and the changes are not now expected to come into effect until 2010 at the earliest. When we know more, we will let you know! For further information on the issues featured here or any other employment law issue contact Burnetts' employment law solicitors on 01228 552222 |
![]() |
|
| Site Map | Legal Info | Professional Indemnity Insurance | Complaints Procedure | Social Responsibility | ||
| © 2010 Burnetts Solicitors. 6 Victoria Place, Carlisle, Cumbria. CA1 1ES 01228 552222 info@burnetts.co.uk | ||