A guide to adjudication in construction contracts
George Farrer explains the process of adjudication, a means of remedy for those who find themselves in a dispute under a construction contract.
What is adjudication?
Parties to a construction contract may be able to refer disputes to adjudication, a cheaper and quicker way of resolving issues.
Adjudication is designed to offer a quick cash-flow remedy during the process of a construction project.
Many sub-contractors and smaller construction companies are often unable to afford to dedicate the time and money to court proceedings or arbitration. This leaves them without remedy if they have not been paid by (sometimes large) contractors. This is often means adjudication is an appropriate option.
Adjudication is concluded by an adjudicator, whose decision is binding on the parties until the dispute is finally determined by legal proceedings, arbitration or by agreement.
Generally, however, it could take months, if not years to resolve a dispute through the courts, whereas adjudication decisions can be made within one month.
Who can initiate or partake in adjudication?
Any party to a “construction contract” has the right to refer a matter to adjudication.
Legislation defines a “construction contract” widely, and there is no requirement that a construction contract has to be an agreement in writing. So, what may seem an informal verbal arrangement could still fall within the definition.
One significant aspect of adjudication is that parties cannot contract out of adjudication. Also, if there are no adjudication provisions in the construction contract, they will in fact be implied into the contract.
What kind of dispute can adjudication be used to resolve?
The main aim of adjudication is to maintain cash-flow during construction projects. Consequently, it is appropriate for resolving financial disputes relating to issues such as:
- Delay & disruption claims
- Extension of time claims
- Disputes relating to final accounts.
It can also be used in breach of contract matters and termination/determination issues often arising after “practical completion.”
The process of adjudication
1. There must be a dispute
There must be a disagreement between the parties where one party is seeking redress.
2. The claim should have “crystallised”
The claim should have been clearly presented to the other side in writing before the formal adjudication process begins. Both parties should know what the dispute is and what redress is being sought. This is important because later down the line, the court will refuse to enforce an adjudicator’s decision that is based on an adjudication notice issued before the dispute in the adjudication has “crystallised”.
3. The notice of adjudication should be prepared and served
The notice of adjudication informs the other party that a dispute is to be referred to adjudication and clearly sets out the scope of the dispute.
4. An adjudicator is selected and appointed
Often there is an adjudicator named in the contract between the parties. The adjudicator must be appointed for the adjudication within seven days of the service of the notice of adjudication.
5. The referral notice is prepared and served
The referring party (the party initiating the adjudication) sets out its case in the referral notice. This is the referring party’s only opportunity to make submissions to the adjudicator. The referring party must serve the referral notice on both the adjudicator and responding party within seven days of serving the notice of adjudication.
The adjudicator’s decision
The adjudicator’s decision is temporarily binding until the underlying dispute is litigated, arbitrated or (most commonly) settled. The correct and most efficient way for a party to enforce the decision of an adjudicator is to seek summary judgment on the decision. This means that a judgment is given by a court without a full trial.
Advantages of adjudication
- The referring party can select the adjudicator/ the characteristics of the adjudicator
- Allows parties to obtain an enforceable decision in a short period of time
- Fraction of the cost of litigation
- The referring party is largely in control. Usually it will have spent months preparing its case, for the receiving party to then only have days/ weeks to respond
- Adjudication rarely has lengthy oral arguments or submissions
Disadvantages of adjudication
- There is no cross examination or formal evidence
- There is no “testing” of evidence
- The adjudicator’s decision must be enforced
For more information on adjudication in construction contracts, contact George Farrer here.
About the Author
George is a Solicitor in the firm's Dispute Resolution team.
Add your comments on this post
New comments on this post are no longer being accepted.